Author name: Marc Alexander

Undertaking: Foreign Plaintiffs Not Suing On A Promissory Note With A Fees Clause Did Not Have To Post An Undertaking For Future Fees If The Defense Eventually Prevails

Cases: Undertaking

  Code of Civil Procedure Section 1030 Was Involved.     Tieni v. Biasiolo, Case No. B267697 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Feb. 22, 2017) (unpublished) concerned Code of Civil Procedure section 1030, which requires non-resident plaintiffs to post an undertaking for reasonable attorney’s fees to ensure collectability of those fees in the event defendant prevails

Civil Rights:  Special Education Code Fee-Shifting Statute Allows Reasonable Fee Award, Not Necessarily Limited To Attorney-Client Contingency Fee Arrangement

Cases: Civil Rights

Education Code Section 44944(f)(2) Was At Issue.             In Walent v. Commission on Prof. Competence of the LAUSD, Case No. B266265 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Feb. 21, 2017) (unpublished), petitioner successfully challenged her dismissal from employment from the L.A. Unified School District.  Education Code section 44944(f)(2) allowed her to seek “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by

Appealability/Arbitration: Plaintiff Successfully Defeating Petition To Compel Arbitration In Ongoing Matter Prematurely Appealed Lower Court’s “Without Prejudice” Denial Of Fee Request

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Arbitration

  Fee Request Can Be Renewed If Someone Prevails, With Appellate Court Distinguishing Or Criticizing Other Decisions Suggesting Otherwise.     In Chan v. Delta Dental of California, Case No. A139739 (1st Dist., Div. 4 Feb. 17, 2017) (unpublished), Plaintiff successfully thwarted a defense motion to compel arbitration and then moved to recover her fees for success,

Employment: Civil Limited Jurisdiction Deadline To Move For Attorney’ Fees Not Applicable Under The Facts

Cases: Employment

Unlimited Civil Default Rules Applied Such That $31,365 Fee Recovery Allowable Under Case Producing About $6,000 Compensatory Unpaid Wage/Penalty Award.     Beck v. Stratton, Case No. B270826 (2d Dist., Div. 4 Feb. 14, 2017) (unpublished) is a situation where the Labor Commissioner awarded an ex-employee about $6,000 in unpaid wages and penalties against his former

Family Law: $412,485 Needs Based Fee Award In Wife’s Favor Affirmed, But $318,510 Fiduciary Breach Fee Award Remanded In Light Of Partial Reversal In Husband’s Favor

Cases: Family Law

  Needs Based Award Was Less Than 30% Of Wife’s Fee Request Under Section 2030.       In Marriage of Schleich, Case Nos. H039870/H041234 (6th Dist. Feb. 8, 2017) (published), ex-husband suffered two adverse awards which were favorable to his ex-wife: (1) a needs-based fee award under Family Code section 2030 to the tune of $412,485

Probate: L.A. Superior Court PVP Attorney Properly Awarded $7,148.93 In Attorney’s Fees And Costs

Cases: Probate

  Case Concerns Trial Court Authority To Award Fees/Costs To Appointed Attorneys For Proposed Conservatees.       This next case, Conservatorship v. Hilton, Case No. B267076 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Feb. 7, 2017) (unpublished), likely is of interest to probate/conservatorship attorneys.       The Los Angeles County Superior court has a program to appoint experienced probate attorneys

Scroll to Top