Author name: Marc Alexander

Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: Lack Of Fundamental Details In Substantiation Doomed Fee Request

Cases: Substantiation of Reasonableness of Fees

  Only $1,500 Awarded Due To Lack Of Detail.       I think we can say with confidence that Achterkirchen v. Montiel, Case No. A147386 (1st Dist., Div. 2 Mar. 28, 2017) (unpublished) demonstrates what a fee claimant should not do as far as submitting substantiation for a fee petition. There, the requesting party sought an […]

Undertaking: Attorney’s Fees/Costs Award Pending For Determination On Appeal Does Not Need To Be Bonded After Satisfaction of Prior Compensatory Parts

Cases: Undertaking

  4/3 DCA Weighs In—Going With Ziello On The Issue, But Inviting Legislative Reform.       Quiles v. Parent, Case No. G054353 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 27, 2017) (published), a by-the-court decision through a panel consisting of Presiding Justice O'Leary, Justice Fybel, and Justice Ikola, considered this question: Does a litigant need to bond

Homeowner Associations: HOA Losing Tree Trimming CC&R Properly Hit With $200,000 In Fees And $20,621.15 In Costs

Cases: Homeowner Associations

  HOA Disputes Can Be Costly, Especially With Fee Shifting! Aspen trees. 2015. Carol M. Highsmith, photographer. Library of Congress.     We have explained that HOA – homeowner disputes can be costly. Especially where one party prevails, in this case the homeowner. In Lingenbrink v. Del Rayo Estates Homeowners Assn., Case No. D070966 (4th Dist., Div.

Family Law/Reasonableness Of Fees: Trial Judge Awarding Only $15,000 In Fees And Costs Based On Requested $77,067.50 In Fees And $17,459.77 In Costs Was No Abuse Of Discretion

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

  Deferential Standard Of Review Not Hurdled In This One.     In Zauner v. Defterios, Case No. B271922 (2d Dist., Div. 6 Mar. 21, 2017) (unpublished), appellant sought needs-based fees in a child custody modification proceeding. She requested $77,067.50 in fees and $17,459.77 in costs, but was only awarded $10,000 in fees and $5,000 in costs.

Assignment: Can A Guarantor Of Attorney’s Fees Defend Against Fee Recovery Based On Malpractice Claim Of Obligor/Client Without Client Involvement?

Cases: Assignment

  No California Case Directly On Point, But Two Out-Of-State Cases Suggest “No.”       Can a guarantor of a client’s fee obligation to client’s attorney sue the attorney for malpractice if the client does not somehow participate or intervene? Although there is no California case on the subject to our knowledge, two out-of-state decisions suggest

Fee Clause Interpretation/Section 1717: $1.79 Million Fee Award To Prevailing Defendants Was Excised As A Matter Of Law From Judgment Based On Lack Of Fee Entitlement

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Section 1717

  Plaintiff Sued On An Oral Agreement Which Was Not Within The Scope Of Stock Purchase Agreement Fee Clause Relied On By The Defense.        Fee entitlement is a basic issue, often tethered to whether a fees clause in a written contract covers the claims at issue in a complaint or cross-complaint. If it

Scroll to Top