Billing Records Are Not Required Substantiation in a Fee Petition.
In U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance Inc. v. McFetters, Case Nos. G041929/G042094 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Nov. 3, 2010) (unpublished), defendants SLAPPed 9 out of 10 claims and were awarded attorney’s fees against losing plaintiff. The defense substantiated the fees by submitting attorney declarations describing their experience, hourly rates, and tasks performed in the SLAPP proceedings. However, they did not attach billing records or apportion work among any claims. Plaintiff challenged what they did not do.
The Fourth District, Division 3, in a 3-0 panel opinion authored by Acting Presiding Justice Bedsworth,
rebuffed plaintiff’s challenges on appeal. Although billing records are helpful, they are not required substantiation in California state fee petition proceedings. Defendants had a near total victory, so that no apportionment between tasks was necessary under the circumstances.
Above photo: Beds.
Plaintiffs also challenged about $300 in costs for LexisNexis and messenger fees, which might not be awardable under Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5. However, the appellate court found this issue fell based on the doctrine of “de minimus non curate lex.” Anyone out there know Latin and what this means? Well, it is codified in Civil Code section 3533–”the law disregards trifles.”

