Private Attorney General: Litigant Obtaining Relief For Himself As Far As Clarifying An Arbitration Award On His Medical License Was Properly Denied CCP § 1021.5 Fees Because It Did Not Vindicate A Broader Interest—Just His Interest

$234,344 Fee Request, Denied By The Lower Court, Was Sustained On Appeal.

In Bulkin v. Medical Board of Cal., Case No. B350396 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Aug. 17, 2026) (unpublished), a physician/surgeon did obtain a prior unpublished successful appeal in which the lower court was directed to remove from the Medical Board’s records a post associating physician’s medical license with an arbitration award involving his employer in connection with a patient’s death.  Physician, arguing he vindicated the interests of other Board physicians and the public, moved for CCP § 1021.5 private attorney general fees to the tune of $234,344.  The lower court denied the fee request by the physician, a determination which was affirmed on appeal.  The problem was that physician secured only a personal victory in an unpublished prior opinion—he did not enforce an important right affecting the public interest, given he did not file a class or representative action or did not seek an directing order for other licensees.  (See, e.g., Roybal v. Governing Bd. of Salinas City Elementary School Dist., 159 Cal.App.4th 1143, 1149.)

Scroll to Top