Private Attorney General:  $648,512.75 Fee Award Under CCP § 1021.5 Is Reversed Where Prior Writ Of Mandate By Plaintiff Was Reversed

However, Matter Remanded To See If Fees Justified Under Catalyst Theory.

            In The Kennedy Commission v. City of Huntington Beach, Case No. E066605 (4th Dist., Div. 2 Oct. 31, 2017) (unpublished), plaintiff obtained a writ of mandate preventing the City of Huntington Beach from implementing its amended Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, but that determination was reversed in a prior appeal.  Before the reversal in the prior appeal, the trial judge had awarded $648,512.75 in fees out of a requested $663,307.75 to plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5.

            In the second appeal of the fee award, the Fourth District, Division 2 reversed based on the prior appeal overturn.  However, it remanded to the trial judge to explore whether fees were justified under a renewed fee motion because plaintiff was a catalyst for changing City changing its behavior (it was looking into amendments of the general plan) because of and in the manner sought by the litigation. 

BONUS:  The Kennedy Commission is named in honor of Ralph Kennedy, a pioneer of affordable housing and advocate of human rights in Orange County, California.  His son, Rusty Kennedy, CEO of the Orange County Human Relations Commission, carries on his father's work.

Scroll to Top