In The News . . . . Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Requests To Withdraw In Representing MGA Entertainment, Inc. In New York Action

 

Follows on the Heels of Requesting $129 Million in Fees For MGA in California Federal Action.

     As reported by Amanda Bronstad in a June 2, 2011 post at Law.com, Orrick–which represented MGA Entertainment Inc. in a California federal court case resulting in a $88.5 million jury verdict win–has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for MGA in a New York federal court case. The reason? MGA owes Orrick over $1.2 million in fees for work on the New York case.

     This has struck some as ironic, given that Orrick on MGA’s behalf recently asked a California federal district judge to award MGA $129 million in attorney’s fees for prevailing over Mattel after a jury trial.

     MGA is also in litigation with its insurers and O’Melveny & Myers, according to the post, with O’Melveny suing last year to recover $10.2 million in fees.

     MGA refused to give a public statement outside of court submissions. U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, the California judge deciding the fee request, has taken the matter under submission.

Dawn Steele recites Tae a Moose
Scroll to Top