Employment: Former Employee Prevailing On Unpaid Wages Claim In Unlimited Jurisdiction Court Was Entitled To $40,000 Fee Recovery

 

Damages Award Was Inside Of $25,000 Jurisdictional Limit, But Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion By Granting Fees Anyway.

    California Code of Civil Procedure section 1033(a) does allow a trial judge to discretionarily deny any award of attorney’s fees to a litigant who files an unlimited jurisdiction case but obtains a damages award under the $25,000 threshold.  The trial judge in Barahona v. Automotive Creations, Inc., Case No. G052354 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Aug. 17, 2016) (unpublished) still awarded a prevailing wage/hour plaintiff $40,000 in attorney’s fees under Labor Code section 218 despite the fact plaintiff won $24,488–$512 shy of the unlimited jurisdiction threshold.

    Employer’s appeal of the fee award was unsuccessful. 

    First of all, the lack of a reporter’s transcript on the fee hearing hampered review.  But beyond that, the trial judge certainly could have concluded that “close, but a cigar” in

Young Woman With Big Cigar

1913.  Library of Congress.

this context was appropriate given that plaintiff fell short by a small amount.

    Presiding Justice O’Leary wrote the 3-0 panel decision.

Scroll to Top