Cases: Probate

Probate: Fee Recovery To Beneficiary Challenging Trustee’s Performance Reversed And Fee Denial To Trustee For Defending Lawsuit Reversed Based On An Overturning Of A Crucial Merits Ruling

Cases: Probate

  Beneficiary Failed To Show Fee Entitlement As A Matter Of Law.       In Morgan-Perales v. Savage, Case No. G052317 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Mar. 9, 2017) (unpublished), an assigned trial judge surcharged a trustee’s interest in a primary trust asset for failure to make rental payments, awarded a beneficiary attorney’s fees for successfully challenging […]

Probate: Ordinary Compensation For Probate Attorneys Cannot “Double Account” The Value Of An Estate Asset.

Cases: Probate

Single Probate Asset Cannot Be "Double Dipped" In Single-Asset LLC Context.     Bock v. Superior Court, Case No. B267174 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Mar. 6, 2017) (unpublished) is a case which involves ordinary compensation for probate attorneys representing personal representatives of a probate estate under Probate Code section 10810–calculated on a sliding scale based on the

Probate: L.A. Superior Court PVP Attorney Properly Awarded $7,148.93 In Attorney’s Fees And Costs

Cases: Probate

  Case Concerns Trial Court Authority To Award Fees/Costs To Appointed Attorneys For Proposed Conservatees.       This next case, Conservatorship v. Hilton, Case No. B267076 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Feb. 7, 2017) (unpublished), likely is of interest to probate/conservatorship attorneys.       The Los Angeles County Superior court has a program to appoint experienced probate attorneys

Probate: Under Equitable Powers, Probate Court Could Impose Attorney’s Fees Against Beneficiaries In Trust Proceeding, Litigated In Bad Faith By Beneficiaries, Even If Beneficiaries Did Not Instigate It

Cases: Probate

  However, Fees Can Only Be Imposed Against Beneficiaries’ Trust Shares, Not Imposed Personally Against Them.      Driving nail in coffin.  May, 1918.  Library of Congress.      Pizarro v. Reynoso, Case No. C077594 (3d Dist. Jan. 18, 2017) (published) is a situation where a probate court imposed attorney’s fees against beneficiaries after finding the litigants

Fee Clause Interpretation/Probate: No Contest Clause In Amended Trust Instrument Did Not Confer Contractual Fee Entitlement Basis

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation, Cases: Probate

  $26,630 Fee Award Reversed On Appeal.     A fertile ground for an appeal in the fee area is that the pertinent attorney’s fees clause simply does not allow for a fee recovery based on its wording where parol evidence is not introduced (and it rarely is in fee disputes).  Kiwata v. Kiwata, Case Nos.

Probate: $25,000 Attorney’s Fees Award Against One Co-Trustee By Fellow Co-Trustee/Beneficiary Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Probate

  Losing Co-Trustee Had Reasonable Bases To Challenge Beneficiary’s Accounting Objections.     In Levy v. Jones, Case No. G051661 (4th Dist., Div. 3 Oct. 25, 2016) (unpublished), one beneficiary/co-trustee successfully obtained a $25,000 attorney’s fees award against another co-trustee based on objections to the trustee’s accounting.  The appellate court, in a 3-0 decision authored by

Probate/SLAPP/Costs Trifecta: Couple Of Reversals And One Affirmance In Multi-Cross Over Areas Of Practice

Cases: Costs, Cases: Probate, Cases: SLAPP

  Probate—Corman v. Corman, Case No. B251513 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Aug. 29, 2016) (Unpublished)—Partial Beneficiary Success Did Not Justify Fee Award.      In this first one, there was a nasty probate fight (I guess one could conjecture whether any are other than nasty) over trust accountings, which pitted the trustees against beneficiaries in most

Probate Two-Fer: Two Reversals—Denial Of Attorney’s Fees For Trustee Work Overturned And Income Beneficiary Fee Recovery Reversed And Remanded

Cases: Probate

  Shelton v. Larson, Case No. G050935 (4th Dist., Div. 3 July 13, 2016) (Unpublished).     In this first one, trustee’s fees and attorney’s fees incurred by trustee were denied altogether in disputes with trust beneficiaries, further complicated by the fact that the probate court never determined the trustee engaged in willful misconduct or gross

Scroll to Top