Cases: Family Law

Family Law: Attorney’s Fees Provision In Settlement Agreement Trumped Attempt To Obtain Family Code Section 271 Sanctions

Cases: Family Law

  Parties’ Bargain Prevailed, With Fees Only Relating To Litigation To Two Specific Motions—Sweeping Away Prior Sanctions Awards.      Family law practitioners should read In re Marriage of Reed, Case Nos. B253728/B255233 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Oct. 21, 2015) (unpublished). Briefly summarized, it held that a specific settlement agreement clause on fee recovery blunted any […]

Civil Rights, Employment, Family Law, Probate, Settlement: Four Unpublished “Power Ball” Post

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Employment, Cases: Family Law, Cases: Probate, Cases: Settlement

  Meyer v. Brown, Case No. D066226 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Oct. 14, 2015) (Unpublished)—Family Law.     In this one, after an evidentiary hearing in which the court dismissed a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO), the prevailing party recovered $7,500 out of a requested $15,800 in fees.  The fee-assessed, losing party appealed, but to no

Discovery/Family Law: 271 Sanctions Remanded For Reconsideration, But Bulk Of $123,087.50 Award Likely To Stand

Cases: Discovery, Cases: Family Law

  Playing Racial/Religion Discrimination Card And Attacking Opposing Counsel/The Court Did Not “Play” Well For Ex-Husband In Bitter Custody Dispute.     Well, this next case – Marriage of Salas and Farraj, Case No. B252053 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Sept. 1, 2015) (unpublished) – is a good lesson for family law practitioners to not play the

Family Law: $22,500 271 Sanctions Award Affirmed On Appeal Where No Legal Basis For Annulment Petition

Cases: Family Law

  However, Sanctions For Frivolous Appeal Denied, With Appellate Court Telling Both Sides To “Behave.”      In Marriage of Weiss, Case No. D065042 (4th Dist., Div. 1 June 22, 2015) (unpublished), husband was sanctioned for $22,500 in fees under Family Code section 271’s sanction statute, about one-third of wife’s request. Husband appealed it, but the

Family Law, Special Fee Shifting Statute: Lower Court Abused Its Discretion In Not Considering Two Fee Entitlement Statutes In Denying Domestic Violence Protection Act TRO Prevailing Party

Cases: Family Law, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Matter Remanded To Consider Fees Request Under Two Statutes.     In Christner v. Sweeney, Case No. H040736 (6th Dist. June 19, 2015) (unpublished), an ex-boyfriend defendant defeated a TRO brought by plaintiff ex-girlfriend from a personal/business relationship under the Domestic Violence Protection Act.  The lower court then denied defendant’s request for fees of $49,812.10 under

Family Law: $375,000 Needs Based Fee Award To Fletcher Jones, Jr.’s Ex-Wife Affirmed For Fees To Fight Nevada Proceedings Relating To Prenuptial, Martial, and Post-Marital Settlement Agreements

Cases: Family Law

  She Had Previously Been Awarded $3.127 Million In Fees.     This next case, authored by Justice Moore on behalf of a 3-0 panel, involves Nevada divorce proceedings relating to prenuptial, marital, and post-marital settlement agreements between Fletcher Jones, Jr. and his ex-wife Kimberly.  After Fletcher had previously paid about $3.127 million of her divorce

Appealability, Family Law: Appealability Of Corrected Judgments On Fee Issues Depends On Whether Substantial Modification Involved

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Family Law

  Court Rejects Simple “Clerical” Versus “Judicial” Correction Distinction.      Ellis v. Ellis, Case No, B248860 (2d Dist., Div. 4 April 2, 2015) (published) is a decision of interest to appellate practitioners and family law practitioners as far as when to appeal from certain judgments (including ones involving attorney’s fees), especially when they are modified

Scroll to Top