Cases: Civil Rights

Civil Rights: Trial Court’s 75% Reduction Of FEHA Attorney’s Fees, After Specific Entry Reductions, Was Reversed Because Limited Success Analysis Was Flawed

Cases: Civil Rights

Evidence On Unsuccessful Claims Was Probative On Successful Claims, So Reduction Needed To Be Restudied.              In Vines v. O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, Case No. B301000 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Jan. 21, 2022) (published), a FEHA plaintiff won on two out of six causes of action, recovering $140,400 on retaliation/failure to prevent retaliation claims, but

Arbitration, Civil Rights, Employment: Employee’s Petition For Writ Of Mandate Granted Where Employer Was Awarded $6,912 In Attorney Fees For Successfully Bringing Motion To Compel Arbitration Of FEHA Claims

Cases: Arbitration, Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Employment

Based On The Standards Set Forth For Imposition Of Fees Under FEHA, Employer’s Arbitration Agreement Did Not Authorize Recovery Of Attorney Fees Absent A Finding That Employee’s Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration Was Groundless.             California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) provides that a prevailing FEHA defendant

Civil Rights, Lodestar, Reasonableness Of Fees: $1,113,750 In FEHA Attorney’s Fees In Racial Discrimination/Retaliation Case Garnering $450,001 Compensatory Award To Successful Plaintiff Was No Abuse Of Discretion

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Lodestar, Cases: Reasonableness of Fees

Hourly Rate, Lodestar, And Multiplier Conclusions Were Not Beyond Reason.             Plaintiff in Sterling v. County of Sacramento, Case No. C089616 (3d Dist. Sept. 7, 2021) (unpublished) won $450,001 in compensatory damages under FEHA racial discrimination/retaliation claims.  Plaintiff then moved for over $1.515 million in fees (lodestar plus a positive 2 multiplier enhancement).  The lower

Civil Rights, Costs: California Supreme Court Holds That Government Code Section 12965(b) Applies To Costs On Appeal And Vacates Award Of Costs On Appeal To Prevailing FEHA Defendant

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Costs

The Court Of Appeal Made No Findings As To Whether FEHA Plaintiff’s Claims Were Objectively Groundless.             In our Year In Review post of the top 30 decisions in 2020, we included as No. 22 the case of Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, 47 Cal.App.5th 532 which had been granted review by the California

Civil Rights: Partial Reversal Of FEHA Plaintiff’s Wins Necessitated A Reevaluation Of The Attorney Fees Awarded To Him

Cases: Civil Rights

Government Code § 12965(b) Authorizes A Court To Award Reasonable Attorney Fees To The Prevailing Party In A FEHA Action, But The Trial Court Has Discretion To Reduce The Award Where, As Here, A Plaintiff Achieves Only Limited Success.             In Moinuddin v. State of Cal., Dept. of Transportation, Case No. B297674 (2d Dist., Div.

Appeal Sanctions, Civil Rights: 2/5 DCA Imposes Sanctions Against County Of Los Angeles For Frivolous Appeal Of Trial Court’s FEHA Fee Denial Based On Finding That Former Employee Plaintiff’s Claims Were Not Frivolous, Vexatious Or Unreasonable

Cases: Appeal Sanctions, Cases: Civil Rights

Although The 2/5 DCA Initially Considered Imposing $8,500 Against County, It Ultimately Reduced The Appeal Sanctions To $900 Based On Contrition Shown By County’s Counsel.             In Sepah v. County of L.A. Dept. of Mental Health, Case No. B297642 (2d Dist., Div. 5 March 25, 2021) (unpublished), former employee sued the County of Los Angeles,

Civil Rights, Costs, Special Fee-Shifting Statutes: Ninth Circuit Vacates And Remands $5,962.11 Costs Award To Defendant Landlord Prevailing On Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Tenant Claiming Race And Disability Discrimination

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Costs, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

In So Doing, The Ninth Circuit Joins The First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Circuits In Holding That The Christiansburg Standard Applies To The Award Of Attorney’s Fees And Costs Under The Fair Housing Act.             The U.S. Supreme Court, in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (1978), held that, under the fee-shifting provision

Allocation, Civil Rights, Costs, Employment: Former Employer Properly Was Denied Attorney’s Fees Where FEHA Case Had Some Substance

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Costs, Cases: Employment

However, 2/3 DCA Follows Roman Opinion On When To Award Costs On Non-FEHA Claims.             In Chevreaux v. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Case Nos. B291268/B292937 (2d Dist., Div. 3 Feb. 24, 2021) (unpublished), a jury returned a defense verdict in favor of a former employer on a non-FEHA, Tameny retaliation claim after she dismissed

Civil Rights: Plaintiff Winning $25,000 FEHA Judgment After Five-Day Jury Trial Properly Awarded Reduced Fee Recovery Of $141,165

Cases: Civil Rights

Plaintiff Requested $492,000 In Fees (Inclusive Of A 1.5 Multiplier).             You might think the plaintiff appealed in this one, but he did not.  The defense appealed the fee recovery, even though the trial judge had awarded a much lower fee recovery from the opening request.             In Velez v. Kohl Building Maintenance, Inc., Case

Civil Rights: $3,164,955.61 Fee Award Under The California Voting Rights Act Affirmed Where Plaintiffs Successfully Challenged City Of Santa Clara’s At-Large City Council Elections

Cases: Civil Rights

Plaintiffs Can Also Seek Compensation For Postjudgment Fee Work Before The Superior Court After Remittitur Issuance.             The California Voting Rights Act, Elections Code section 14030, has a pro-plaintiff, private attorney general-type of fee shifting provision, which states: “ . . . the court shall allow the prevailing plaintiff party, other than the state or

Scroll to Top