Author name: Marc Alexander

Appealability, Sanctions: Dentist’s Failure To Provide Patient Records Results In Sanctions Of $935

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Sanctions

  Sanctions Order Was Appealable, With Substantial Evidence Supporting It.      Pulling tooth from elephant.  Nov. 3, 1924.  Library of Congress.      A patient has a statutory right to a copy of medical records on request, with this right enforceable by a special proceeding for an order to show cause allowing the court to impose […]

Costs, Employment, Prevailing Party: LLC Defendant Obtaining Dismissal Entitled To Fee Recovery Under Former Labor Code Section 218.5 And Routine Costs In Employment Case Involving Meal Breaks

Cases: Costs, Cases: Employment, Cases: Prevailing Party

  Current Section 218.5, Requiring Bad Faith By Employee, Not Retroactive Before January 1, 2014.      In Quiles v. Koji’s Japan Inc., Case No. G049238 (4th Dist., Div. 3   April 3, 2015) (unpublished), employee in an employment case, involving multiple claims including meal breaks, added LLC defendant on an alter ego theory. Eventually, LLC defendant

Special Fee Shifting Provision: Wel. & Inst. Code Section 14124.76 Determines Cal Dep’t of Health Care Services’ Share Of Medi-Cal Injured Party’s Attorney’s Fees Allocable Dep’t As Far As Lien Reduction For Reimbursement

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

  State Department’s Interpretation of Statutory Scheme Rejected.      Although Aguilera v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, Case No. D066701 (4th Dist., Div. 1 April 2, 2015) (published) is a very practice-bound, technical decision, we still report on all areas of attorney’s fees.      Aguilera held that Welfare and Institutions Code section 14124.76’s formula, not

Appealability, Family Law: Appealability Of Corrected Judgments On Fee Issues Depends On Whether Substantial Modification Involved

Cases: Appealability, Cases: Family Law

  Court Rejects Simple “Clerical” Versus “Judicial” Correction Distinction.      Ellis v. Ellis, Case No, B248860 (2d Dist., Div. 4 April 2, 2015) (published) is a decision of interest to appellate practitioners and family law practitioners as far as when to appeal from certain judgments (including ones involving attorney’s fees), especially when they are modified

Fee Clause Interpretation: Broadly Worded Fees Clause Allowed Fee Recovery Against Unsuccessful Landlord On Tort Claims

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

  Clause Was Broad, No Apportionment Necessary For Jointly Represented Co-Defendant, And Awarded Fees Were Reasonable.      In Ocean View Resort Partnership v. Solanki, Case No. G048728 (4th Dist., Div. 3 April 2, 2015) (unpublished), plaintiff landlord lost a conventional lawsuit (not unlawful detainer) against defendant tenant based on certain tort claims, with the trial

Allocation, Construction: Rio School District Decision, On Rehearing, Reaches Same Result On Remanding A “Re-do” Of Attorney’s Fees On Public Contract Code Claim

Cases: Allocation, Cases: Construction

  Same Result From Decision Surveyed in Our January 28, 2015 Post.      On January 28, 2015, we posted on Rio School District, a Second District, Division 6 decision where a substantial attorney’s fees award was remanded for redetermination after the appellate court determined that an unclean hands defense was legally not cognizable under Public

Have A Wonderful Weekend !

Uncategorized

SO THAT'S WHERE EGGS COME FROM, AND HOWARD THURSTON, PROFESSIONAL MAGICIAN, PULLS AN EASTER EGG FROM THE MOUTH OF BUZZIE DALL AT THE WHITE HOUSE EGG ROLLING FESTIVALS. THE GROUP, FROM THE LEFT: JANE THURSTON, DAUGHTER OF THE MAGICIAN; SISTIE DALL AND BUZZIE, GRANDCHILDREN OF THE PRESIDENT; MR. THURSTON; AND MRS. ROOSEVELT.  1934. Library of

Private Attorney General: Carian Decision Now Published

Uncategorized

  Prior Unpublished Decision Affirmed Denial Of 1021.5 Fees For Failure To Make Proper Informal Settlement Efforts.      In our March 11, 2015 post, we discussed Carian v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, Case No. D066683 (4th Dist., Div. 1), which originally issued as an unpublished decision on March 9, 2015. It affirmed a trial

­­­­Indemnity: Title Company Escrow Disbursement Clause Only Encompassed Fee For Third Party Disputes, Not First Party Recovery

Cases: Indemnity

  Language Of Disbursement Clause Was Crucial In A De Novo Appellate Review Situation.      At our home page sidebar under “Indemnity,” we have posted many times–and you can gather our posts–on whether language in contractual indemnification clauses gives rise to contractual attorney’s fees recovery. Rideau v. Stewart Title Co. of California, Inc., Case No.

In the News . . . . N.D. Cal. District Judge Informs Class Counsel In Wells Fargo Overdraft Class Action That Fees Cannot Be Based On Subjective Evidence

Cases: Class Actions, In The News

  Also Indicates That Defense Counsel Billings Will Not Remain Sealed Forever.      In Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 07-05923 WHA (N.D. Cal.), U.S. District Judge William Alsup recently ruled on March 27, 2015 that class counsel in the Wells Fargo overdraft class action—who won a $203 million restitutionary judgment—must support their

Scroll to Top