Author name: Marc Alexander

Family Law: Section 271 Sanctions Award Against Ex-Wife And Section 2030/2032 Denial Of Needs-Based Award To Ex-Wife Both Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Family Law

Both Sides Had Paid Or Owed A Cumulative $1.841 Million In Dissolution Proceedings.             We are not sure that the appellate court was happy with any of the parties in this case that we now report on.   After all, in the dissolution saga, ex-husband had paid attorneys $900,000, still owing $70,000, while ex-wife had paid […]

In The News . . . . 2018 Martindale Attorney Compensation Report Distills Survey Results For U.S. Solo Practitioners And Small Firms In 2017

In The News, Interesting Survey Results

$198,000 Was The Mean Annual Compensation, And Most Attorneys Would Have Chosen A Law Career Again.             The Martindale Legal Marketing Network, in 2018, has initiated its first annual Attorney Compensation Report which involved a survey of more than 7,800 U.S. attorneys across two dozen practice areas—concentrating on 6,902 full-time practitioners who were either solo

Interpleader: Where Foreclosure Trustee Also Sought Fee Reimbursement And Other Relief, Settlement Of Interpleader Action Was Not Moot

Cases: Interpleader

Trial Judge Correctly Dismissed Trustee’s Interpleader Complaint.            In Placer Foreclosure, Inc. v. Aflalo, Case No. B268589 (2d Dist., Div. 6 May 30, 2018) (published), a foreclosure trustee foreclosed an owner’s property based on a deed of trust, with the sale resulting in surplus proceeds of $ 974,786.81. The former owner sued trustee and foreclosure buyer

Civil Rights/Multiplier: Ninth Circuit Affirms $5,378,174.66 Civil Rights Fee Recovery, Inclusive Of 2.0 Positive Multiplier, For Five Prisoners Winning Compensatory And Punitive Damages Against County Of Los Angeles And Supervisory Jail Officials

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Multipliers

Prison Litigation Reform Act Did Not Cap Unruh Act Fee Recovery.             In Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, No. 13-56292 et al. (9th Cir. May 30, 2018) (published), the Ninth Circuit reviewed and affirmed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force verdicts of $740,000 in compensatory damages and $210,000 in punitive damages (the latter against

Special Fee Shifting Statute: SCOTUS Decides That Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Of 1996 Does Not Allow For Reimbursement Of Legal, Accounting, And Consulting Fees Related To Private Investigations Of Alleged “Fraudsters” In Non-Criminal Proceedin

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

$5 Million In Legal, Accounting, And Consulting Fees Relating To Private Fraud Investigation In Bankruptcy Proceedings Not Recoverable Under The Act.            In Lagos v. United States, No. 16-1519 (U.S. Sup. Ct. May 29, 2018), petitioner was convicted of using a company he controlled to defraud a lender of tens of millions of dollars. After the

Fee Clause Interpretation: Fee Recovery To Litigant Prevailing On Cross-Complaint With Mixed Tort/Contract Claims Properly Denied Because Fees Clause Only Related To More Narrow “Account” Issues

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Litigant Failed To Show Fee Entitlement.             Assuming that a fee motion is timely filed, the next big obstacle for a fee claimant is demonstrating – drum roll time! – fee entitlement. That obstacle was not cleared by appellant in Schneider v. Deam, Case No. A150027 (1st Dist., Div. 2 May 29, 2018) (unpublished).            

Costs, Special Fee Shifting Statute: Superior Court Properly Awarded General CCP § 1032 Prevailing Party Dismissal Routine Costs Totaling $1,010 In Dismissed, Transferred Small Claims Action

Cases: Costs, Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

Appellant Argued Small Claims Special Statutory Prohibition Applied, But It Did Not.             We once in a long while get a case involving a small claims matter, which the next case happens to be. These matters, in the fees and costs area, usually focus on whether general CCP routine costs provisions prevail or whether special

Intellectual Property: D.N.J. Fed. Court Awards $13.8M In Attorney’s Fees And Costs To Defendant Zimmer Inc. In 13-Yr. Patent Infringement Battle With Howmedica Osteonics, Finding That The Matter Was “Exceptional” Under Patent Fee-Shifting Statute

Cases: Intellectual Property

District Judge Sustained $990 Hourly Rates As Reasonable For Some Senior Defense Attorneys With Large U.S. Firms.             On May 23, 2018, U.S. District Judge William Walls (D.N.J.) unsealed a 39-page decision by which he articulated reasons for awarding defendant Zimmer Corp. $13,296,559 (out of a requested $13.5 million) in attorney’s fees and $513,258 (the

In The News: Recent Survey Shows Almost ½ Of Surveyed Firms Miss Annual Billable Hourly Targets, Over ½ Of Equity Partners Not Busy Enough, 59% Report Nonequity Partners Underutilized, And 83% Said They Have Some Lawyers Who Are Chronic Underperformers

In The News

Substantial Number Of Firms Say Pricing Is Key Client Concern, With Nearly 80% Believing That Non-Hourly Billing Is A Permanent Trend.             Altman Weil, in its survey entitled “2018 Law Firms in Transition,” has some interesting statistics showing that law increasingly is a more volatile marketplace than in past years. Conducted in March – April

Scroll to Top