Among Other Things, Lambasting The Trial Judge Was Not Proper.
In Estate of Kim & Weston, Case No. B281109 (2d Dist., Div. 8 Dec. 18, 2018) (unpublished), appellant relied on a voluminous appendix and 66-page opening brief with very few citations. Appellant also lambasted the trial judge in the AOB. That resulted in the appellate court finding the appeal frivolous, given an in pro per attorney was involved, awarding $22,515 paid to respondent and $8,500 to the appellate clerk for the costs of the reviewing court working up the appeal.