Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Award Of Fees Under Civil Code Section 3496 Against City Of El Monte Was Affirmed On Appeal

Procedural Challenge Did Not Prevail.

In City of El Monte v. Lincoln, Case No. B344087 (2d Dist., Div. 2 Feb. 23, 2026) (unpublished), City lost a post-judgment fee order against plaintiff based on losing successive demurrers based on Civil Code section 3496.  That section, applying to abatement by a municipality relating to a controlled substance, does allow an award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing party—it is not unilateral in nature.  City’s main argument was that the prevailing party fees could not exceed the fees incurred by the governmental agency, a proposition rejected because the fee-shifting provisions contained no limitations on fees.  (See City of Monte Sereno v. Padgett, 149 Cal.App.4th 1530, 1537 (2007).)

Scroll to Top