Requests For Admission: Denial Of Postjudgment Fees Was Error Where Plaintiff Made Stipulation Which Tacitly Demonstrated That RFA Denial Might Have Been Unjustified

 

Remand In Order to See If Any Exceptions Applied.

     In Mobasser v. Yermian, Case No. B247269 (2d Dist., Div. 7 Apr. 22, 2014) (unpublished), defendant appealed a lower court’s refusal to award $22,408 in postjudgment attorney’s fees based on plaintiff’s denial of a request for admission that plaintiff was not an employee. CCP § 2033.420 allows fee-shifting if an RFA denial was not justified and a requesting party can show the fees were causally attributable to the denial.

     The defense won a remand on this issue. Plaintiff did stipulate that he was a partner deep into the litigation, which the appellate court construed as a tacit concession that he was not an employee. Even though no jury verdict was reached on the issue, the defense did have to present proof and a remand was in order to see if the RFA denial was justified so as to prevent fee-shifting in a post-appeal proceeding.

Scroll to Top