May 2018

Request For Admissions: $56,700 Proof-Of-Sanctions Fee Award Affirmed On Appeal

Cases: Requests for Admission

Lack Of Reporter’s Transcript Sealed The Result.             In Ayoub v. Candee, Case No. D073279 (4th Dist., Div. 1 May 31, 2018) (unpublished), adjoining rural property owners in Temecula got into an “ado” regarding easements. Eventually, the losing parties/appellants were hit with $59,700 in attorney’s fees for making unjustified requests for admission denials under CCP

Intellectual Property: Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals Determine Preponderance Of Evidence Burden Of Proof Governs And No Need To Show Bad Faith In “Exceptional” Lanham Act Cases For Purposes Of Fee Shifting

Cases: Intellectual Property

Fourth Circuit Joins Fifth And Ninth Circuits On Preponderance of Evidence Burden Of Proof.             In Verisign Incorporated v. XYZ.COM, LLC, No. 17-1704 (4th Cir. May 29, 2018) (published), the Fourth Circuit vacated and remanded an attorney’s fees denial order in a Lanham Act case. In doing so, the federal appeals court decided: (1) the

Family Law: Section 271 Sanctions Award Against Ex-Wife And Section 2030/2032 Denial Of Needs-Based Award To Ex-Wife Both Reversed On Appeal

Cases: Family Law

Both Sides Had Paid Or Owed A Cumulative $1.841 Million In Dissolution Proceedings.             We are not sure that the appellate court was happy with any of the parties in this case that we now report on.   After all, in the dissolution saga, ex-husband had paid attorneys $900,000, still owing $70,000, while ex-wife had paid

In The News . . . . 2018 Martindale Attorney Compensation Report Distills Survey Results For U.S. Solo Practitioners And Small Firms In 2017

In The News, Interesting Survey Results

$198,000 Was The Mean Annual Compensation, And Most Attorneys Would Have Chosen A Law Career Again.             The Martindale Legal Marketing Network, in 2018, has initiated its first annual Attorney Compensation Report which involved a survey of more than 7,800 U.S. attorneys across two dozen practice areas—concentrating on 6,902 full-time practitioners who were either solo

Interpleader: Where Foreclosure Trustee Also Sought Fee Reimbursement And Other Relief, Settlement Of Interpleader Action Was Not Moot

Cases: Interpleader

Trial Judge Correctly Dismissed Trustee’s Interpleader Complaint.            In Placer Foreclosure, Inc. v. Aflalo, Case No. B268589 (2d Dist., Div. 6 May 30, 2018) (published), a foreclosure trustee foreclosed an owner’s property based on a deed of trust, with the sale resulting in surplus proceeds of $ 974,786.81. The former owner sued trustee and foreclosure buyer

Civil Rights/Multiplier: Ninth Circuit Affirms $5,378,174.66 Civil Rights Fee Recovery, Inclusive Of 2.0 Positive Multiplier, For Five Prisoners Winning Compensatory And Punitive Damages Against County Of Los Angeles And Supervisory Jail Officials

Cases: Civil Rights, Cases: Multipliers

Prison Litigation Reform Act Did Not Cap Unruh Act Fee Recovery.             In Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, No. 13-56292 et al. (9th Cir. May 30, 2018) (published), the Ninth Circuit reviewed and affirmed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force verdicts of $740,000 in compensatory damages and $210,000 in punitive damages (the latter against

Special Fee Shifting Statute: SCOTUS Decides That Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Of 1996 Does Not Allow For Reimbursement Of Legal, Accounting, And Consulting Fees Related To Private Investigations Of Alleged “Fraudsters” In Non-Criminal Proceedin

Cases: Special Fee Shifting Statutes

$5 Million In Legal, Accounting, And Consulting Fees Relating To Private Fraud Investigation In Bankruptcy Proceedings Not Recoverable Under The Act.            In Lagos v. United States, No. 16-1519 (U.S. Sup. Ct. May 29, 2018), petitioner was convicted of using a company he controlled to defraud a lender of tens of millions of dollars. After the

Fee Clause Interpretation: Fee Recovery To Litigant Prevailing On Cross-Complaint With Mixed Tort/Contract Claims Properly Denied Because Fees Clause Only Related To More Narrow “Account” Issues

Cases: Fee Clause Interpretation

Litigant Failed To Show Fee Entitlement.             Assuming that a fee motion is timely filed, the next big obstacle for a fee claimant is demonstrating – drum roll time! – fee entitlement. That obstacle was not cleared by appellant in Schneider v. Deam, Case No. A150027 (1st Dist., Div. 2 May 29, 2018) (unpublished).            

Scroll to Top